GOOD GUYS vs BAD GUYS IS COMPELLING GROUPTHINK, DESIGNED TO MISDIRECT PUBLIC ATTENTION, TO CONCEAL AMORAL PROFIT-FIRST EXPLOITATION BY ENTRENCHED POWER

Friend versus enemy, faithful versus corrupted, good versus evil: choose your favorite dichotomy, it doesn't matter. Tribalism is compelling. It's melodrama designed to misdirect public discourse away from scrutinizing the real business of exploitation. Governments, corporations, institutions, vested interests, city halls, these power dynamics use the same method. Democracy itself subordinates to this corrupt pantomime.

POSTMODERNISM IS THE BANAL CONSENSUS WAGING CULTURE WAR AGAINST ART, SCIENCE AND INDIVIDUAL GENIUS

How did a mere academic movement of the mid 20th-century metastasize - over less than three generations - into a neo-identitarian phenomenon powerful enough to be assimilating venerable institutions whole departments at a time? Public opinion (and therefore policy) is being subordinated to a consensus mediocrity, hostile to talent, individuality and merit. Is society helpless against this confederacy of dunces; or is there a deeper more sapient power dynamic embedded in postmodernism's banality substrate?